Compare the lateral (side) views of the two skulls below. The one on the left is an exact cast of KNM ER 3733, which represents Homo ergaster (or early African H. erectus). The one on the right is a reconstruction by F. Weidenreich of the so-called "Peking Man" (Asian H. erectus from China), which is based on many fossils from the Zhoukoudian cave. Photos are not to the same scale.
Homo ergaster Homo erectus

Note the difference in the shape of the cranium. On the right, H. erectus has a long cranium with a "transverse torus," a protruding area of bone at the back of the braincase. H. ergaster has a more globe-shaped braincase that lacks this torus. Although the African cranium and the East Asian reconstruction both depict females, the later H. erectus (right) exhibits larger browridges. Compare the two, this time in frontal view.

According to many scientists, the early African population represented a more "generalized" form of archaic human, one that could have given rise to the modern human species, whereas Asian H. erectus may have been too specialized in its appearance. If so, the latter is its own interesting and long-lived branch in our family tree. But other scientists disagree; they think that the variation between the two reflects a single evolving lineage.

Homo ergaster Homo erectus

Return to Homo erectus.
Return to Homo ergaster.

Navigation Bar for the Human Origins Web Site

Home | Human Origins Program | Human Ancestors | What's Hot! | Ask a Researcher | FAQ's