In the time period dating from 2.3 and 1.2 million years ago eastern Africa
was populated by the early human species Paranthropus boisei. This
species represents the most extreme version of the "robust"
early humans in eastern Africa. Paranthropus boisei had a skull highly
specialized for heavy chewing. They flourished in the drier savanna areas
that existed in eastern Africa at the time. But by around 1.2 million years
ago, Paranthropus boisei disappears from the fossil record. With
a major change in Earth's climate, which involved larger, irregular fluctuation,
adaptability may have been critical to survival as old resources dwindled
or disappeared. The highly specialized Paranthropus boisei might
not have been able to effect such adaptability in the face of change.
The original specimen of this species, the "type specimen," is the OH
5 skull found in 1959 by Mary Leakey at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. The
photograph on the top-right is a reconstruction of OH 5 with the mandible
of another individual scaled to fit (the original find did not include
the lower jaw).
Below OH 5 are two very important P. boisei fossils; KNM ER 406
and KNM ER 732, thought to be a male and female respectively.
There was some earlier debate in the paleoanthropological
community as to the number of early human species in southern Africa
between 3 and 1 million years ago. Conventional wisdom had it that
two species existed, Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus
robustus. In contradiction to this view, Milford Wolpoff, of
the University of Michigan, advocated the"single species hypothesis".
It claimed that the differences between the southern forms were
caused by age differences and sexual dimorphism of the specimens.
Many researchers had problems with this hypothesis. For example,
why in southern Africa were the supposed males dying at a different
place than the supposed females? And why were they dated to almost
a half a million years later? It was clear that a larger fossil
record would be needed to prove or disprove this hypothesis.
Interestingly, the answer to the question of the southern African
early humans would come from hundreds of kilometers away in East
Africa. The discovery of two fossils, KNM ER 406 and KNM ER 732,
at Koobi Fora in eastern Africa would provide the necessary expansion
of the record needed to disprove the "single species hypothesis".
Upon discovery its in 1969, ER 406 showed enough similar morphology
to be assigned to the same species as OH 5; with the addition of
ER 732, comparisons could be drawn between the two that could shed
light on the nature of dimorphism in early humans. As these two
specimens were examined, researchers found that the early humans
of this period followed what is called the great ape model of sexual
dimorphism. Male crania were larger than females, and more heavily
constructed. While differences existed between the two skulls, these
differences were exactly what would be expected between the sexes
in other great apes.
The two southern African forms, however, did not fit this model
of the distinction between the sexes. The differences were too great
to be the result of sexual dimorphism. This observation favored
the idea of two distinct species in southern Africa.
The final blow to the "single species hypothesis" was the 1975
discovery of the cranium KNM ER 3733, assigned now to Homo ergaster,
in the same layer as ER 406, the "robust" form Paranthropus
boisei. Scientists finally knew for sure that more than one species
of early human coexisted in the same geographical area. The old single
line of progressive evolution was, once and for all, split into branches.
And the human family tree has never looked the same since.
The "Peninj mandible" is a nearly complete mandible of Paranthropus
boisei. It provided researchers with their first understanding of
the complete adult dentition and the structure of the lower jaw of this
species.